Showing posts with label GST Explanation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GST Explanation. Show all posts

Monday, 31 October 2016

Welcome Videos, Bye Bye Boring Article



Launching "GST Bites", Video Series on GST.

Since passage of  Constitution Amendment bill for GST, we saw a plethora of sites writing / explaining GST and it's nitty-gritties. But, many GST learners found themselves lost in this ocean of GST articles / blog posts. More importantly, there is very little reliance on the articles that we read unless, you know credentials of the author. Hence, launching a video series which will be made by three Chartered Accountants.
Credentials of the authors for this Video Series -
Ashok Kumar Madrecha (CA, BCom Hons) - Practicing CA since 1989
Adarsh Ashok Madrecha (CA, DISA)           - Consultant at EY (Ernst Young)
Priya Adarsh Madrecha (CA, CS)                 - Ex Consultant at KPMG

1st video is out, have a look and don't forget to subscribe for more such videos.



Some of the 1st Reaction of viewers.

Intuitive and interesting videos.
Finally some fun in learning Tax
So simple and unique way to explain GST
Great Initiative, video is just awesome


Small Background

When me and my colleagues and friends started this blog, we were ahead of time in starting this GST blog. The topic of GST was in and out of media just like a movie actor. Then Constitution Amendment bill was passed unanimously by Parliament. It paved the way for GST law and now we (as well as our beloved Finance Minister +Arun Jaitley ) are confident that GST will be applicable from 1st April 2017.
Read more

Friday, 16 January 2015

Decoding 122nd Constitutional Amendment Bill for GST

By CA Vinod Kaushik

Background 

Before going into the depth of Constitution of India and its amendments we have to first understand why it needs to be amended to bring the GST Law. The GST Law is seen as one of the biggest tax reform in our country since Independence. The man who is behind this concept of GST in India is Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee who was the prime minister of India from 1998-2004. The Domestic and Foreign Industry Players are always having concerns with our present Indirect Tax System and its administration. India is Federal Country where Centre and State has its own taxation powers inbuilt in our constitution. The Union is levying Excise duty, Service Tax, Custom duty and States are levying and collecting VAT, CST, entry Tax, entertainment Tax. The Constitution is required to be amended because the Power of State and Centre shall be restructured in the Constitution itself and the Seventh Schedule which contains Union and State List shall be amended.

Development in Goods and Service Tax from 2006 till Date

In this phase of my write up I am trying to explain the step by step events from the date when the concept of GST was first introduced by Union Finance Minister in his Budget Speech of 2006-2007. In his Budget Speech of 2007-2008 Mr. P. Chidambaram requested the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers (EC) headed by Dr. Asim Dasgupta to work with central Government to prepare the road map for introduction of GST from 01-04-2010. After this delegation by Union FM to EC the EC then formed a Joint working Group to study the International Models of GST across the world. In November 2007 the Joint Working Group submitted its report to EC which contains the Dual GST structure for Indian Economy.

After due discussion between Central Government and Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers the First Discussion Paper was prepared to make the GST Law a reality in India. The First attempt to introduce GST was made by then Finance Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee on 16-03-2011 by introducing the Constitutional 115th Amendment Bill 2011 and the bill contains the amendments which were necessary to make the GST Law. The Bill was then sent to Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance headed by Yashwant Sinha former Union Finance Minister and after due discussion with stakeholders and States the Committee submitted its Report with recommendation in August 2013 to both the Houses of Parliament. As usual the Centre Revised the Draft Constitutional Amendment Bill by accepting most of the recommendations made by Standing Committee and after this the Centre discussed the revised bill with States to reach on some conclusions. Unfortunately the helpless, unwilling and scam driven UPA Government could not convince the States on revised bill soon after the election were declared and the regime of UPA was demolished by Modi wave.

Now the BJP led NDA Government which people voted for development, growth and employment again started discussion with the states under leadership of Shri Arun Jaitley (Union Finance Minister) and finally reached on conclusion by drafting a fresh bill on Constitutional Amendment. The above said bill was drafted by keeping in mind the earlier developments and suggestion made by Standing Committee on Finance and pending demands of State Finance Ministers. The Constitutional (122nd) Amendment Bill, 2014 was introduced in Loksabha on 19-12-2014.

Now I have made a small attempt to decode this Amendment Bill and give you clarity on each and every aspect of the Bill. Before that it’s worthwhile to understand the process of amendment of Constitution.

Article 368: Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure thereof : Amendment in Constitution can be made by introducing a bill in either house of the Parliament and Bill has to be passed by 2/3 members of each house Present and voting, After this bill shall be sent to the president for its assent But if the bill need amendment in any of the list in 7th schedule ( Other articles also given) then it has to be ratified by at least half of the state assemblies After ratification by half of the state assembly it shall be sent to President of India for its assent. From above discussion you can understand that it is impossible for the Union Government to Introduce GST without support of States Assemblies and opposition in both the Houses of Parliament.

Now the provisions of this Bill have been analyzed one by one, and wherever possible comparison has been made with the Bill drafted by the UPA Government.

STEP BY STEP ANALYSIS OF 122ND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BILL

Insertion of Article 246A: This Article was inserted in the main body of Indian Constitution after Article 246 to empower both the Centre and State to legislate on a common matter i.e. GST. Earlier the power of both the Governments were separate under Union list and State list, Without inserting 246A it is not possible for parliament to make Law on a matter which is neither mentioned in Union List and State List. The power to make laws on interstate transactions has been kept exclusively with Central Government.

Amendment in Article 248: The article 248 has been amended to avoid contradiction between this Article and Article 246A. The article 248 gives exclusive powers to parliament to make laws on matters not mentioned in State and Concurrent list. The amendment has added word “subject to 246A” Parliament has exclusive power to make laws on matters not mentioned in State and Concurrent list.

Amendment in Article 249: Earlier the above article was giving power to Parliament to make laws on the matters in State list if the same is necessary in the national interest. The above law can be made if the council of the states support this law by 2/3 majority. The amendment has inserted word Goods and Service tax also in this article so that Parliament can make law of GST.

Amendment in Article 250: This amendment is similar to that in 249, only difference is that this article comes into operation at the time of emergency and Article 249 comes when law is necessary in national interest.

Amendment in Article 268: Before amendment this article was giving power to Central Govt. to levy Stamp duties and Excise on Medicinal Toilet Preparations and collection powers were given to respective States. Now the amendment has deleted word Excise on Medicinal Toilet Preparations which means no more excise duty by states on Excise on Medicinal Toilet Preparations. This is a welcome move in GST to reduce the burden of multiplicity of taxes levied presently by State Govt.

Omission of Article 268A: This Article was giving power to Centre to levy Service tax and such tax shall be collected and appropriated by Centre and States together. Now under GST Regime no service tax exist hence the importance of this Article was no more required in the Constitution of India accordingly the same has abrogated from Constitution.

Amendment in Article 269 and Insertion of Article 269A: Before understanding the amendment made in Article 269 we have to understand the new Article 269A which grants exclusive power to Centre to levy integrated goods and Service Tax (IGST) on interstate transactions. This Article categorically says that Import of goods and Services into Indian Territory shall attract IGST. Now we can discuss 269 which was giving power to Central Govt. to levy taxes on Interstate sales i.e. CST and taxes on consignment of good and now the amendment has restricted the applicability of above article only on those taxes which are not mentioned in Article 269A i.e. IGST.

Amendment in Article 270 and 271: The Article 270 prescribe that the taxes levied by Union shall be distributed with the states and 271 has restricted the power of Parliament to increase the rate of GST by a surcharge for the purpose of Union. Under the GST Regime the increase of taxes shall be decided by the GST Council under Article 279A.

Insertion of Article 279A: In India the GST has been introduced in Dual structure i.e. Centre shall levy Central Goods and Service Tax (CSGT) and State shall levy State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) and in addition Centre shall levy Integrated goods and Service Tax (IGST). The above concept can only work on the basis of cooperative federalism between the Centre and State and this give rise to a platform where Centre and State can discuss various issues related to GST. Under 279A a council shall be constituted which shall be called GST Council consisting representation of Centre and States respectively.

Salient Features of GST Council:

A. The GST Council shall consist Union Finance Minister as a Chairperson, Union Minister of State in charge of Finance as a member, the State Finance Minister or State Revenue Minister as a member of the Council and the State FM shall select one of them as Vice Chairperson of Council.

B. The quorum of GST Council shall be ½ of its members.

C. Every Decision of the Council shall be taken at a meeting by a majority of at least ¾ of the weighted votes of the members present and voting. The vote of Centre shall have a weightage of 1/3 of total vote cast and vote of States taken together shall have weightage of 2/3 of total vote cast. From this mathematics we can conclude that Centre has VETO Power in the GST Council for decision making.

D. One of the contentious Clause of Article 279A is recommendation made by GST Council to the Union and the States on various critical matters. After so many meeting and deliberations this clause has been finalized and produced as under:

The Council shall make recommendation to the Union and States on following matters:

    Which taxes, surcharge, Cesses levied by Union, States and Local bodies shall be subsumed in GST. The taxes levied at present by Centre i.e. Excise Duty, Additional Excise duty, Service Tax, Additional Custom Duty, Special additional duty, Excise on Medicinal Toilet Preparations and Central Cesses and surcharge shall be subsumed in GST and taxes levied by States i.e. VAT, Entertainment Taxes, Luxury tax, lottery tax, CST and Entry taxes or Octrio shall be subsumed in GST. Basic Custom duty will remain alive and shall be collected by Custom Authorities as usual.

After taking several rounds of meeting by Union Finance Minister with State FM the above issue of items to be subsumed into GST has been resolved and still the alcohol is outside the ambit of GST and Petrol products has been included in the GST but they shall enjoy their present status unless recommended by GST Council as taxable under GST.

    Second recommendation by GST Council shall be with regard to Goods and Services which shall be exempt under GST regime, threshold under GST Law, Model GST Law i.e. GST Act GST Rules, Principal which shall govern place of supply rules etc.

3. Third recommendation by GST Council shall be with regard to floor rate with band of goods and services; this recommendation was not included in 115th constitutional amendment bill drafted by UPA Government in 2011. Though states were adamant on this issue but in my personal opinion the power to change the rate of GST shall bring down the harmonization of GST Law. But any how the Union Finance Minister has VETO in the GST Council and we assume he shall not allow any such adverse decisions except under special circumstances.

    In this part I am merging rest of the recommendations and they are special provisions to some states including Jammu and Kashmir, special rates for specified period to meet natural calamity and disaster and last are the residuary power i.e. any other matter relating to GST as the Council may decide.

We have not discussed one question which is coming into my mind about the disputes among various states or states with Centre; The earlier bill of UPA regime had provision of Dispute settlement Authority which was opposed by almost all of the states and also by Standing Committee on Finance and therefore this bill contains one provision that Council shall decide about the modalities to resolve the disputes arising out of its recommendations.

Amendment of Article 286: This article imposed restriction on States to make law on Interstate transactions and also the Import into Indian Territory. The amendment has just replaced the word sale or purchase of goods with supply of goods or Services or both. This amendment has deleted the concept of declared goods from Constitution itself. In the GST regime there is no concept of declared goods or goods of special importance.

Amendment of Article 366 : In this Article law makers has inserted clause 12A, Clause 26A and Clause 26B, Now Clause 12A has defined word “goods and service tax” , Clause 26A has defined word “service” and Clause 26B has defined meaning of “State”. “Goods and service tax” means any tax on supply of goods or services or both except taxes on supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption. Definition is very simple and technically barred the alcoholic liquor for human consumption from GST through constitution, Earlier the states were demanding petrol products in the same category as alcoholic liquor for human consumption.

“Service has been defined as anything other than goods” and States has been defined as “States includes Union Territory with legislature”.

Amendment of Article 368: The procedure of amendment has been discussed earlier in this write up and there are certain matters where the amendment of Constitution is to be ratified by half of state assemblies and therefore by this amendment article 279A (GST Council) has been kept into that category also.

Amendment of Sixth Schedule: The sixth schedule contains the provisions as to administration of tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram, by amending this schedule law maker has empowered district council of these states to levy and collect taxes on entertainment and amusements.

AMENDMENT OF SEVENTH SCHEDULE: This schedule contains the union list, state list and concurrent list and the amendment of this list before introducing GST was very crucial for law makers. The major amendments have been proposed in both union list and state list which are discussed hereunder.

Changes proposed in union list: Earlier entry 84 has empowered centre to levy excise on all products including tobacco products but excluding alcoholic liquor or human consumption, now the amendment will take away the power of centre to levy excise on manufacturing except tobacco and petrol products. In nutshell in place of excise centre shall levy CSGT and IGST. Entry 92 and 92C has been proposed to delete the concept of taxes on sale or purchase of newspaper and advertisement thereon and service tax as levied by centre at present on provision of service.

Changes proposed in state list: Entry tax has been subsumed in GST therefore entry 52 has been deleted from state list and entry 55 empowering states to levy the tax on advertisement has been deleted from constitution itself. By amending entry 54 states has been empowered to levy tax on petrol and its related products except the sale of these items in interstate business. Entry 62 has been proposed to subsume luxury tax in the GST and taxes on entertainment and amusement shall only be levied and collected by local bodies only.

GST is destination based consumption tax : GST is a destination based consumption tax hence revenue shall accrue to those states where goods or services are finally consumed, now the producer states shall be discouraged for such huge production and to compensate them an extra 1% tax on supply of goods shall be levied for 2 years.

Compensation for States for loss on account of GST implementation shall be adequately placed in constitution and the period of compensation may not go beyond 5 years.

The Indian Industry is waiting very desperately for GST because it will subsume major indirect taxes levied by Central Government and State Government which will remove the cascading effect of taxes on costing of the Industry. The GST if implemented shall make the tax structure simple and hassle free for trade and Industry.

Now as on date everyone including me is hopeful that this amendment bill get passed in budget session of the parliament and also ratified by the states concerned. If all goes well in next session specially Rajyasabha the GST become reality from 01-04-2016.

This article is written by  +CA Vinod Kaushik 
Read more

Monday, 22 December 2014

122nd Constitution Amendment Bill for GST Explained

GST 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill

Introduction

GST will substitute many indirect taxes which are levied by Center and State Government. This shall require changes in constitution to give power to Central Govt to enact new taxation law.
The Union Cabinet approved on 17th December, 2014 the proposal for introduction of a Bill in the Parliament for amending the Constitution of India to facilitate the introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in the country. The Union Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley introduced the said Bill in the Lok Sabha on 19th December, 2014. Which can be downloaded from Downloads section.
This is not the first time the Constitution Amendment Bill is brought for introduction of GST. Earlier UPA Govt had introduced similar bill, but was lapsed.

Before we discuss the Constitution Amendment Bill for GST, we need to know peculiarities of the Lists given in part XI of the Constitution of India. Which gives powers to Central and State Govt to enact laws. If you know, these already, please continue to Highlights of the bill.
  • The Union List or List-I is a list of 100 items (though last item is numbered 97) on which Parliament has exclusive power to legislate
  • The State List or List-II is a list of 61 items (Initially there were 66 items in the list)
  • The Concurrent List or List-III is a list of 52 items(though the last item is numbered 47)  concerned with relations between the Union and States
Ordinarily speaking if govt had to bring a law which is subject matter of state list, then they would add that item in concurrent list or in union list. But there is a catch in this. The items specified in the concurrent list have a overriding power by Central Govt over State Govt.[Article 246][Article 256]. That's why to give equal powers, another article i.e. Article 246A is introduced. Article 246A states
Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State. Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. 

The bill has 21 Clauses, most of which propose to make changes to Union, State and Concurrent List. Other important amendments are - Formation of new Council for overseeing GST, Compensation to Sates for a period of 5 years from Center. 

Salient features of Bill

Read more

Sunday, 7 December 2014

Taxes which shall be replaced by GST


There is a talk of GST coming soon, and we all are happy about it as it shall substitute many taxes. But are we aware exactly which taxes shall go when GST comes?

New List of taxes as per 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill for GST.
  • Central Excise Duty
  • Additional excise duty, 
  • Excise Duty levied under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties)Act, 1955,
  • Service tax,
  • Additional customs duty (CVD),
  • Special additional duty of customs (SAD), 
  • VAT / State Sales Tax & Central Sales Tax  ,
  • Octroi and Entry Taxes,
  • Purchase Tax,
  • Entertainment tax (Other than levied by Local Bodies),
  • Luxury tax,
  • Taxes on lottery betting and gambling,
  • Central & State cesses and surcharges. 
Source : 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill for GST

As per the old design, the central and state taxes to be subsumed in GST were
  • Central excise duty,
  • Additional excise duty,
  • Service tax,
  • Additional customs duty (CVD),
  • Special additional duty of customs (SAD),
  • Surcharge,
  • Cess,
  • VAT/sales tax,
  • Entertainment tax,
  • Luxury tax,
  • Taxes on lottery betting and gambling,
  • Entry tax not in lieu of octroi,
  • State cesses and surcharges.


Source: Report submitted to the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers
Read more

Friday, 14 November 2014

Understanding Revenue Neutral Taxation

You might have heard that, GST Rates will be decided on the principle of Revenue neutrality.
Today, we are going to understand what exactly is 


The true definition of revenue neutrality if you ask, it will be:
  • A condition of fiscal policy making in which any increase or decrease in tax revenues be achieved with a commensurate increase or decrease in tax revenues.For example, a proposal to decrease taxes for one economic group must include a mechanism to increase tax revenues from another source in order to offset the revenue decrease.
  • Taxing procedure that allows the government to still receive the same amount of money despite changes in tax laws. The government may lower taxes for one particular group of people, but raise taxes for another group. This allows the revenue that they receive to remain unchanged (neutral).

In Our case, GST sense, it will be imposing some taxation and to remove few other taxation in a way that, there is no loss of revenue to government. The purpose if to simplify the taxation structure at the same time take care that, there is no loss of revenue to government as GST will be a major overhaul in the Indirect taxation in India.
Let's take an example, Govt collects 10Rs from Excise on 100Rs manufactured, 12Rs from Service Tax on 100Rs Services provided, 15 from Sales Tax on 100Rs of Sales. So, total amount collected is 37 (10+12+15) on 300 Rs of activity. If we were asked to calculate a revenue neutral rate for a new taxation which replaces these 3 taxation, we will calculate it to 12.33% (37/300). This way even if the govt looses revenue from abolishing the 3 taxes, it would earn exactly the same from new tax. This is revenue neutral taxation, or call it a revenue neutral tax rate.

National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) is tasked with recommending a revenue neutral tax rate for the goods and services tax. The NIPFP website lists the below description for work they do.
Tax Policy and tax administration has been among the core areas of interest in the Institute. The Institute was and continues to be at the forefront of research on tax policies in India. The Chelliah Committee Report, which formed the basis for economic reform initiatives in the early nineties, was supported by work at the Institute. The debate on introduction and design of State-level Value Added Tax in India was anchored around a study by the Institute on Reform of Domestic Trade Taxes in India. One of the first systematic studies on Unaccounted Incomes in India was undertaken at the Institute in 1982. The team at the Institute has been consistently providing policy inputs through research papers on issues relating to tax policy reforms in India.  In recent times, the focus areas of research have been understanding unaccounted incomes in India, issues in the design of GST for India, evaluation of major tax incentives and analysis of state specific tax regimes for identifying mechanisms for augmenting revenues.

Now let's discuss some technicality. Below is a publication by NIPFP discussing
Revenue Implications of GST and Estimation of Revenue Neutral Rate: A State Wise Analysis
Publication date - Jan, 2013
Report submitted to the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers
Authors
R. Kavita Rao, Pinaki Chakraborty,
The study was undertaken at the request of the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers to assess the state specific GST tax base and corresponding revenue neutral rates. As a part of this study, state wise possible revenue loss/gain in the event of introduction of GST was also done.

Full details can be found here

A few summarized para from this publication.

An exercise of this nature requires an estimation of correct base for GST which in any form of taxation is the key for the measurement of tax potential. Theoretically, the applicable base of GST depends on a number of factors related to its design, e.g., whether it is origin or destination based, of the income or consumption type, implemented with a credit invoice or subtraction method and contains many or few exemptions. As discussed, the proposed GST will be destination based, consumption type system implemented with a credit invoice method, like the present VAT.

The starting point for the estimation of base is the gross domestic product of an economy, in the case of states, the gross state domestic product, since it represents the sum total of the value added in the production of goods and services within a state economy. However, for a destination based consumption type GST, the legitimate question that arises is whether final consumption expenditure, which represents the sum total of value added of domestic consumption is not a more direct starting point in estimating the base. Though at the outset it appears to be correct, in practice, it depends to a large extent on the scope and the nature of exemptions under consideration. For a destination based consumption type of GST levied comprehensively with no exemptions, the base is simply the final consumption on goods and services, which may not be possible in the real life situation. Like in the case of goods, even in the proposed GST regime, there are many services that would be exempted from the service taxation.
Generally, there are three alternative methods of estimating base of GST, viz., GDP adjusted for exports and imports, the consumption expenditure and the taxable turnover of goods and services. GDP adjusted for external sector transactions would represent the total expenditure on private consumption, government consumption, fixed capital formation and changes in business inventories. The estimated GDP adjusted for the value of services of exempted sector, government wages, fixed capital formation and net consumption abroad would precisely define the GST base. Although GDP data is available from the national account statistics, it is very difficult to get disaggregated data on exempted sectors and on value of goods and services to be excluded from GST base. Use of GDP, thus as GST base becomes problematic even at the national level GST calculation. It becomes even more difficult in the case of states as there is no reliable data available on exports and imports from and to the states apart from the items to be excluded from the estimation of GST base within the exempted sector from the state GSDP. In many states it has been argued that a substantial portion of the IT services are exported out of the state and this is not available for taxation. However, we do not have reliable data on state level IT export.

Another alternative, which can be used as the base of GST, is consumption expenditure on goods and services. The consumption expenditure data is available at the state level as well as at all India level. The state specific consumption expenditure data can be used as a proxy for GST base. The aggregate private consumption expenditure data for the country as a whole is provided by the National Accounts Statistics (NAS). State wise consumption expenditure data is also available from national sample survey on 5 yearly bases. This method of estimating GST base is called consumption expenditure approach. However, the consumption expenditure method is not free from limitations, primarily due to the non-availability of data on exempted commodity consumption and exemption of dealers with turnover below the taxable limit. Given these limitations, it is difficult to estimate the GST revenues of individual states through consumption expenditure approach.
Another limitation of the National Sample Survey consumption expenditure data is that it suffers from the problem of underestimation of consumption expenditure for both goods and services when compared with the private final consumption expenditure provided in the national accounts statistics. In fact, as per the 61st round (2004-05) consumption expenditure survey, the total private final consumption expenditure was Rs. 931415 crore, and as per the National Accounts Statistics, the same was Rs. 1873729 crore. In other words, NSS estimates of private final consumption expenditure was 49.7 percent lower than the NAS estimates. Given this gross underestimation of base by the NSS consumption expenditure survey, we have not used it. Also the listing of goods and services in the NSS schedule is quite different from the actual taxable base of goods and services. Also as the consumption expenditure data reflects household consumption, relying on it for the purpose of tax base would be erroneous. There exist issues of concordance between the two estimates of consumption based on their methodologies. While NSS is a household survey and their estimates of private consumptions are based on only household information and does not include consumptions of the private non-profit organisations serving the households, NAS on the other hand is derived from a commodity flow approach.

It is possible to estimate GST revenues through "tax turnover" method. Advantage of tax turnover method is that it is based on the data of taxable turnover of goods available with the respective sales tax department of states on goods. As under GST, like in VAT, tax paid on input by a VAT registered dealer would have to be rebated, one has to estimate the inputs eligible for input tax rebate from the tax turnover data. It is also to be noted that inputs eligible for credit will be the taxable inputs alone. Thus, one has to determine not only the input component from the taxable turnover, but also the structure of input used, viz., taxable input and non-taxable/exempted inputs. Another issue that requires attention is the quantification of locally produced inputs and the use of imported inputs within the taxable inputs as they are treated differently in current VAT regime.
In case of goods, as it is well known, taxable goods produced within a state is sold via (i) local sales, (ii) taxable inter-state sales, (iii) consignment/branch transfers and (iv) international exports. We have not been able to obtain the VAT data available with individual sales tax department on turnover in a short span of time and also there are major data issues on taxation of goods specific turnover in many states. Thus, we have used the alternative approach to arrive at turnover of goods. We have used weighted average tax rates for the estimation of taxable turnover from the data on tax collected under VAT excluding those which would not form part of the GST, viz., liquor, diesel, petrol and ATF.



Read more